
Semtleware
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Founded Date April 20, 1990
-
Sectors Security
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 15
Company Description
This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence business that establishes open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the company in 2023 and acts as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 model offers reactions equivalent to other contemporary large language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were established in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were intended to limit the ability of these 2 countries to establish innovative AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its first free chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share cost to stop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus larger and more established competitors has been described as “overthrowing AI”, [8] making up “the first chance at what is becoming an international AI space race”, [11] and ushering in “a brand-new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, allowing its code to be freely offered for use, adjustment, viewing, and designing documents for building functions. [13] The business supposedly intensely hires young AI researchers from top Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer technology field to diversify its designs’ knowledge and capabilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading because the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while participating in Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on developing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative artificial intelligence chatbot open source, its code is freely offered for use, modification, and watching. This includes consent to gain access to and utilize the source code, along with design files, for constructing functions. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip constraints on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic basic intelligence lab devoted to research developing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary company. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the laboratory became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital firms were reluctant in offering financing as it was not likely that it would have the ability to produce an exit in a short period of time. [15]
After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which provided strong efficiency for a low cost, DeepSeek became called the driver for China’s AI design rate war. It was rapidly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI“, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the rate of their AI designs to take on the business. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its competitors that were losing money. [20]
DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no detailed prepare for commercialization; [20] this likewise allows its technology to avoid the most rigid provisions of China’s AI policies, such as needing consumer-facing technology to comply with the government’s controls on details. [3]
DeepSeek’s hiring choices target technical capabilities instead of work experience, leading to a lot of brand-new hires being either current university graduates or designers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the business recruits people without any computer science background to assist its technology comprehend other subjects and understanding areas, including having the ability to produce poetry and perform well on the infamously hard Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its very first series of design, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available for totally free to both scientists and commercial users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license agreement (“DeepSeek license”) concerning “open and responsible downstream usage” for the model itself. [21]
They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series includes 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of direction data. This produced the Instruct designs.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B specifications in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was released). It was developed to contend with other LLMs available at the time. The paper claimed benchmark outcomes greater than a lot of open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]
The architecture was basically the like those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text gotten by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat versions of the two Base designs was also launched concurrently, acquired by training Base by supervised finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared equivalent efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared experts” that are always queried, and “routed experts” that might not be. They discovered this to assist with professional balancing. In basic MoE, some specialists can end up being overly depended on, while other professionals may be seldom used, wasting criteria. Attempting to balance the professionals so that they are equally used then causes specialists to reproduce the same capacity. They proposed the shared experts to learn core capabilities that are typically used, and let the routed professionals to learn the peripheral capacities that are hardly ever utilized. [28]
In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K mathematics issues and their tool-use-integrated detailed services. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The benefit model was a process benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This benefit design was then used to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math questions “related to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward model was continually upgraded throughout training to prevent benefit hacking. This resulted in the RL model.
V2
In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 designs, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 larger designs were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 phases. The first phase was trained to fix mathematics and coding problems. This stage used 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The 2nd stage was trained to be helpful, safe, and follow rules. This stage used 3 benefit designs. The helpfulness and security reward models were trained on human preference information. The rule-based reward model was by hand configured. All experienced reward designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the launched version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They chose for 2-staged RL, because they discovered that RL on thinking information had “special qualities” various from RL on basic information. For instance, RL on reasoning might improve over more training actions. [31]
The two V2-Lite designs were smaller sized, and skilled similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to assist “further research and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]
Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and utilized the mixture of experts (MoE) alternative formerly released in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was cheaper than its peers with a rate of 2 RMB for every single million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they launched 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline information, then combined with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math issues was computed by comparing with the ground-truth label. The reward for code issues was produced by a reward model trained to anticipate whether a program would pass the system tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they launched a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is basically the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It contained a greater ratio of mathematics and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of thinking (mathematics, shows, logic) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, simple concern answering) information. Reasoning information was created by “professional models”. Non-reasoning information was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by humans. – The “expert designs” were trained by starting with an undefined base model, then SFT on both data, and synthetic data generated by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to reflect and confirm throughout thinking. Then the expert models were RL using an unspecified benefit function.
– Each specialist design was trained to generate just artificial thinking data in one specific domain (mathematics, shows, reasoning).
– Expert designs were used, rather of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad format, and extreme length”.
4. Model-based benefit models were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference data consisting of both last benefit and chain-of-thought leading to the final benefit. The benefit model produced benefit signals for both concerns with objective but free-form responses, and questions without objective responses (such as innovative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward models and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was computed for math issues with a final answer (put in a box), and for programming issues by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek team performed comprehensive low-level engineering to accomplish efficiency. They used mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the standard 32-bit, needing special GEMM routines to collect properly. They used a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the interaction latency by overlapping extensively computation and interaction, such as dedicating 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU communication. They lowered communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact device each professional was on in order to avoid specific devices being queried regularly than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]
After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 surpassed Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became available via DeepSeek’s API, as well as through a chat interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for rational reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it surpassed performance of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal stated when it utilized 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a solution faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company likewise released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic information generated by R1. [47]
A discussion in between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant solves it. The assistant first believes about the reasoning procedure in the mind and then provides the user with the response. The reasoning procedure and answer are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking process here answer here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they used no model-based reward. All reward functions were rule-based, “mainly” of two types (other types were not specified): precision benefits and format rewards. Accuracy benefit was inspecting whether a boxed response is correct (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format reward was checking whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has problems with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to deal with these problems and additional enhance thinking: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the very same RL process as R1-Zero, however likewise with a “language consistency reward” to motivate it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal design not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking information from the internal design, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the generated reasoning had a wrong final answer, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning data (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for thinking tasks) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K information synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and reactions
DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually gone beyond ChatGPT as the highest-rated complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot apparently responds to questions, resolves logic issues and composes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI business. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 utilizes considerably fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers using as many as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to require just about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta spent building its latest AI innovation. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at reasonably minimal cost has actually been acknowledged as potentially challenging the global supremacy of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 design was apparently “on par with” one of OpenAI’s newest designs when used for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen likewise explained R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]
DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely applauded DeepSeek as a nationwide possession. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with experts and asked him to supply viewpoints and tips on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has actually highlighted potential limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, which include export limitations on advanced AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models as a result “sparked market chaos” [57] and caused shares in major international technology business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech firms likewise sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had caused record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was cleaned off American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended reactions to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are included in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “extremely excellent”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed apprehension of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to use the design in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack disrupted the correct functioning of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have observed that the official application shows interface (API) version of R1, which ranges from servers found in China, utilizes censorship mechanisms for topics that are thought about politically delicate for the federal government of China. For instance, the design refuses to address concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially create a response, but then deletes it shortly later on and replaces it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The integrated censorship systems and limitations can only be eliminated to a restricted degree in the open-source variation of the R1 design. If the “core socialist values” defined by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” and stated: “We firmly oppose any form of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are devoted to accomplishing the total reunification of the motherland through peaceful methods.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists were able to fool DeepSeek into offering specific answers to a few of these topics by requesting in its answer to switch particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and privacy
Some experts fear that the federal government of China might use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, monitoring and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms and conditions say “We store the information we gather in safe and secure servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you provide to our model and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy is consistent with ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired post reports this as security issues. [80] In response, the Italian information protection authority is seeking additional info on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal information, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had begun a national security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government banned making use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek’s usage of personal details. [83]
Expert system industry in China.
Notes
^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed selecting “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user might utilize it only 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s inexpensive, open AI model DeepSeek thrills researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world prepared to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s less expensive designs and weaker chips call into concern trillions in AI infrastructure spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may hit India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals expanding of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you should understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to drop?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI design conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI model exceeds Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, exceeds Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI model seems one of the very best ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first reasoning model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn cleaned off US stocks after Chinese firm reveals AI chatbot” – via The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek postures a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI model advancement highlights limits of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot sparks US market chaos, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek sparks international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely remarkable”: “We must take the developments out of China extremely, really seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘impressive'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends enormous Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS customers, including Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek briefly limited new sign-ups, pointing out ‘large-scale harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually triggered a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t appreciate complimentary speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a global AI race: geopolitics, development and the increase of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, offering the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI postures formidable cyber, data personal privacy risks”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts prompt care over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator seeks information from DeepSeek on information security”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House examines impact of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, official states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.